Holland On Rails Comments Feed

JSONP

jeroenbulters@gmail.com(Jeroen Bulters) — Thu, 13 Oct 2011 09:15:20 +0200

You are correct and I have adjusted the post above accordingly. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.

(sidenote: I left the post almost intact, just for the record).

JSONP

jan@defv.be(Jan De Poorter) — Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:45:42 +0200

Actually, you can do

render :json => object, :callback => params[:callback]

And it works. It’s not documented in the default Rails documentation, though.

Here’s the implementation code:
https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/4f044528c0373b0a581a12b1311a7a544ded6c58/actionpack/lib/action_controller/metal/renderers.rb#L96

Reverse search in IRB

wijnand@videre.net(Wijnand Wiersma) — Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:36:26 +0200

Great! I really miss reverse search in my irb sessions.

Git tip: Removing remote tags

johan@holder.nl(Johan Vermeulen) — Mon, 09 Aug 2010 10:50:21 +0200

I already use GRB to manage my branches, but this article is about delete remote tags, not branches. If it is possible to delete local/remote tags with grb, I stand corrected if I’m wrong.

Git tip: Removing remote tags

chiel.wester@holder.nl(Chiel Wester) — Fri, 06 Aug 2010 11:25:37 +0200

You can make this a lot easier for yourself by using git_remote_branch.

You can just call grb delete and your remote branch will be deleted.

Suppress Rails logging

michaelkoper@gmail.com(Michael) — Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:19:07 +0200

Hey Dax!

Maybe handy to have a boolean somewhere to hide and show the SQL queries? in development.rb or something.

Can imagine that you would like to see the sql queries the most of the times.

Michael

RubyAndRails Conference 2010

michaelkoper@gmail.com(Michael) — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:33:19 +0200

Mooie reden om Nederland weer eens te bezoeken :)

Writing more with less

jeroenbulters@gmail.com(Jeroen Bulters) — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:10:15 +0200

You forget to mention that less.js is also suited for server side node.js apps, serving the same purpose as the less gems for ruby.

Browser testing web apps

michaelkoper@gmail.com(Michael) — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:42:01 +0200

Ziet er goed uit! Vind het altijd maar irritant om tests weg te gooien of 20 keer te veranderen…

Named scopes, still needed ?

royalain@gmail.com(Roy van der Meij) — Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:12:11 +0200

For scopes with parameters I totally agree, those should be put in a class method.

But for your last example I prefer the “scoped” way.